Notice
  • One of the files that is needed for the correct operation of the System - CW Gears plugin appears to be missing! Please install a fresh copy of the latest version to fix this issue.

Report comment

There is undoubtedly no two-way traffic about the obvious fact that the TBC case is about both media freedom and wrongful dismissal, and neither is just about wrongful dismissal nor is it just about media freedom but both, as wrongfully politicised by the CEO of TBC.

Just to further add that this is, amongst an infinite array of recurrent problems, symptomatic of the complete disregard and denial by the prime minister and his government of the very sociopolitical foundation of good governance (transparency, accountability, equality and justice) on which they conciously campaigned for parliament.

The principles of good governance, viz., transparency, accountability, equality and justice. are underpinned by the "rule of law," where all the constitutional and legal elements are expected and deemed to be constantly upheld in government and the whole of society.

There is a key question that arises, Is the complete disregard and self-denial of good governance that is deeply embedded in the "rule of law" intentional or accidental or both? If it is intentional then the problem is one of arrogance but if it accidental then the problem is one of ignorance.

But if it is both intentional and accidental, the the problems are both arrogance and ignorance, with arrogance itself a form of ignorance or for that matter the one is a mirror image of the other and vice versa!