“ ABSOLUTELY NOT, PITA...YOU CANNOT GUESS YOUR WAY INTO AN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE, EVEN IN THIS FORUM WHERE INTELLECTUAL WRITERS PUBLISH THEIR WORKS…YOU'VE GOT TO GET THE CORRECT TERMS IF YOU'RE AN EXPERT...OR CALLING YOURSELF AN ACADEMIC RESEARCHER...
1. Even in this forum, you must show respect in an intellectual discussion by writing intellectually, if you’re challenging other intellectual writers (My original essay was an intellectual paper written for the popular media). Not paying attention to small details disqualifies your argument on an educated level. If you fail in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and quoting sources correctly with me, or any other educated writer, then your arguments are not deserving to be addressed intellectually.
2. You do show your level of writing in an academic paper when if it is free of errors; it shows your disrespect and carelessness, and you're trying to defraud this community with excuses we hear from Government corrupted officials, and uneducated folks.
3. Your academic "Problem Statement" and "End State" analyses should not preclude other possible (alternative) solutions, if you're an academic researcher.
4. Your conclusion against a "PUMP STORAGE HYDROPOWER" for Tonga because it is too expensive, shows how shortsighted your research paper's scope is. Clean and renewable energy sources are not free;
5. WIND POWER: And you don’t know that wind power has down-time problems? I'm utterly surprised that you're claiming 100% wind power availability in Tonga; and you call yourself an academic researcher, using scientific methods?
6. And you want evidence that the wind does not blow at times? Look around you if you’re not blind and deaf (excuse the pun, but you’re writing like an uneducated person). ”