Menu
cache/resized/7a303faa48902efd848c7494b9385c2b.jpg

RED

Rapid Engineering Diagnostic

Specialize in:

...
Latest News

Ministry of Education Examinations & Assessment Unit Report Featured

Ministry of Education Examinations & Assessment Unit Report

Editor's Note: This is a summary of a 14 pages report submitted by the Examinations & Assessment Unit (EAU) of the Ministry of Education and Training in response to some of the questions raised from the Tonga Media Council and the public on matters related to Examinations 2015

The Ministry should be alerted that consultations with all its divisions and stakeholders  are  vital  to  the  smooth  and  successful  transition  towards outcome-based  assessment.  More  importantly, the transition  needs  to  be driven educationally but not politically. We have a duty to assess thoroughly, interpret, and use the results to enhance teaching and learning. Our duty includes reporting accurately and honestly to parents on the actual progress and achievements of our students. An informed school community will be supportive of our stand on any national assessment regime.

The purpose of this report is to provoke discussion within the Ministry of Education on multiple issues that the Exams and Assessment Unit are concerned with in terms of Assessment as the transition from standardized testing to outcome-base assessment progresses and consideration of the recommendations from the Examination and Assessment Unit.

Issue 1: Validity of the Inferences to be drawn from the result of the External Assessment

The purposes of assessment are for teachers and users of the examination results  to  make  an “integrated  evaluative  judgments  of  the  adequacy  and appropriateness of inferences and actions based on test scores”. Validity – thus, is judgment that the decisions made as a consequence of the assessment were appropriate, defensible, sound, trustworthy, and legitimate.

The concern:

How can we address validity of the assessment tool (exams) for subjects (e.g Computing & ICT, Mathematics, & most subjects) where only a total of 48 Do Statements are to be assessed from a total of 300+ prescribed in the syllabus? This does not cover at least 25% of what the students were taught.

Can we say that the inferences / decision making / judgment of the child’s performance as measured by the external exams are valid?

Issue 2: Delay in the Ministerial Assent of the Official Curriculum

The delay in the Ministerial making official of the reformed curriculum has posed the following threats to EAU and the schools.

•        Late dissemination of IA Summary & Information Package to schools in 2016.

i.    This is Week 5 (which is halfway through Term 1). EAU will need at most TWO  weeks  to  work  on  constructing  the  IA  Summary  Forms  &  IA Programs for 2016 (given that the curriculum will be made official this week). This will take us through to Week 7.

ii. Teachers  would  also  require  at  least  a  month  to  work  on  their submissions for IA Summary Forms and IA Programs for 2016. This will take them through to the beginning of Term 2.

iii. The implementation of the IA programs in schools depends on when their IA programs gets approved. Experiences from past years saw some IA programs take up to June to be approved.

iv. The late implementation of IA in schools can have drastic effects on the validity and reliability of IA tasks being conducted.

v.  Late implementation of IA Programs for 2016 infers that there will be a delay in the due dates for submission of IA marks to EAU (as compared to past years) & that administering ofIA tasks  in  schools  will  be congested towards end of Term 2 and whole of Term 3. The implications for teachers and students are quite disturbing.

•    The new assessment system that the reformed curriculum entails call for urgent capacity building of teachers to prepare them for this new system. Teacher  readiness  is  the  key  to  the  effectiveness  of  this  reformed curriculum. EAU team in collaboration with CDU team should be out there in the field delivering workshops to ensure teachers are ready to implement the new assessment system in 2016. School visits are due especially to outer-islands to train/prepare teachers to the new assessment system and the required assessment practices & procedures.

The concern:

The Ministry’s initiative to introduce the outcome-based curriculum in 2016 has put schools and EAU to a mad-rush. There is a concern that given the speed with which the reformed curriculum and assessment are being pursued, there is fear that the urgency will drive out the important things.

Is the Ministry’s preoccupation with the outcome-based curriculum at the expense of teachers’ capacity-building, students’ adaptations to change and EAU concerns regarded as being of lesser importance?

Issue 3: Implication on Budget 2016/2017

The ‘raw marks’ that the reformed curriculum intends to report assumes that the mark submitted from schools are valid and reliable. This cannot be verified and is an issue that should be looked at carefully to allow for procedures that will result in the submission of valid marks as well as within the affordability of the Ministry and budget allocation for the Examination and Assessment Unit.

A whole lot of IA tasks in the old system were Teacher-Designed and hence were moderated by the ATLAS program at no cost. In the reformed curriculum, majority of the IA tasks are required to be controlled by the EAU to allow for quality control of marks submitted from schools. As a result, EAU will have to contract more CAT writers, moderators and markers – and it will have financial implications.

The concern:

Is the Ministry ready to finance all the extra costs that the reformed curriculum imposes?   Costing of EAU activities in past years amounted to ~TOP$70,000+. In the reform curriculum, although number of IA tasks has reduced to only two per subject, the number of CAT tasks and tasks requiring moderation visits has tripled; hence costing is likely to be tripled.
 
Issue 4: Accreditation of the Raw Mark Qualification

The  EAU  have  been  receiving  requests  from  parents  for  the  standardized version  of  the  TNFSC  Exam  Results  2015  to  enable  their  children  to  be admitted to NZ universities. This is due to the raw marks qualification not being recognized by NZ universities as it is not in accordance with the New Zealand Vice-Chancellors Committee (NZVCC) Regulation to which all NZ universities act in accordance when assessing applications of Tongan students for admission to degree programs.

The Ministry should therefore attend with urgency to the accreditation of the raw marks qualification in order to allow our students to be admitted to any degree program and university as they wish. The Ministry should lobby in to EQAP, NZQA and universities to identify ways in which our qualification can be recognized by the NZVCC and universities abroad.

The concerns:

1. School leavers not being able to be admitted to universities in New Zealand and further abroad due to unrecognized raw mark qualification as letters from Massey and Auckland Universities indicate that they only recognize the standardized marks that were later issued last month. Most if not all of the form seven and six students were retained here in Tonga.

2.  Students that have to repeat form seven, six and five due to the raw marks.

As only TSC 19%, TFSC 42%, TNFSC 48% passed last year. Very Low pass of form 5 and 6 retains a lot more students at these levels. According to USP they have lowered the pass mark to 200 however students that had marks like say less than 40 marks for mathematics will have to repeat foundation Mathematics and other such subjects like these. These students would not have repeated had their standardized marks been issued and considered by USP like the previous years. The parents and most of the students were penalized for what?

Issue 5:  Piveni’s software

This software is unreliable as a lot of the results were manually checked and they do not match the rest of the correct ones. The results generated by this software are inconsistent. It also requires manual entering and processing of data not automated as the TITAN program.

Piveni’s “quick fix” software is no where comparable to the free and accredited ATLAS program of EQAP which can generate more accurate and has a history of what was entered correctly or incorrectly into the system.

The Concern:

A lot of the results reported so far may be incorrect as we have discovered only a few mistakes manually and also through Re-mark.
 
RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Tonga continues to use the current prescription (delayed 2 months now) while we continue to amend/change/unpack the current syllabus and start the professional development for the new syllabus this year to be trialed next year.

2. Use only ATLAS program of EQAP (which is free and recognized) on our raw marks and not resort back to the very expensive, need a lot of upgrade and unreliable software of Piveni’s.

3. Work with EQAP on the accreditations of our Raw marks, talk with New Zealand and Australia about our way forward in accreditation of our new raw mark qualification as this is a National Crisis.

9 comments

  • Sione A Mokofisi
    Sione A Mokofisi Sunday, 29 May 2016 08:56 Comment Link

    MĀLŌ FIFITA MO FĀHINA...Ko hono kānokató ia.
    1) Māmanu pa'anga; fo'i loi kuo lāunga e mātu'á 'i he fehālaaki 'a e polokalama "standardization" ka e hūmai 'a Pīveni mo Siaosi Pōhiva mo 'ena polokalama "raw marks."
    2) Tā ko e fo'i lasu ka e fai e fakapone.
    3) Hili ko iá, na'e te'eki sivi'i 'a e polokalama 'a Siaosi mo Pīvení 'i ha fonua, pe 'e fokifokihi 'e ha kau mataotao (peer reviewed).
    4) 'Osi tala 'e Dr. Vesisio Pongi, mo hono fetongi talēkita 'i he SPBEA 'oku fiema'u 'a e "standardization" ki he kahau'u 'o e tamaiki akó.
    5) Ko eni kuo 'ikai tali 'e he ngaahi 'iunivēsiti 'o NZ. Uanoa ha fiu feinga'i 'a AUST mo USA.
    6) 'Io, fakatatau ki he poto faka-ako 'o e PM/Ministā Ako, ko e tu'unga GPS pê. Tāne'ine'i ke mahu'inga ange 'a e fake-poné 'i he langa hake 'o e fonuá.

    Report
  • Fifita
    Fifita Saturday, 28 May 2016 17:40 Comment Link

    Mou kataki pe he na'e taumu'a kumi pa'anga pe fakakaukau ia..ka koeni kuo kaila holo ia koe loto pe eni ia 'o e kau Pule Ako mo e kau Talekita e ngaahi ako..Palemia ngutu loi mo ha'i kapa lahi taha eni e mamani..Kole atu ka Viola ke tukuange mai he letio e fakataha ko ia ke 'ilo'i 'ene lea na'e fai he na'e anga peheni..te'eki maau e ngaahi talanga ko ia fekau'aki mo e liliu ki he raw mark kuo ta'ofi mai ia 'e he Palemia ke ne faitu'utu'uni ke "FAI HONO LOTO" mo 'ene tu'utu'uni...ka kuo loi holo ia he taimini 'o tukuaki'i koe loto e kau talekita moe kau puleako...Mahalo ko e me'a ia 'oku kalo holo ai meia Viola ..malie PM 'Akilisi

    Report
  • Fahina
    Fahina Thursday, 07 April 2016 22:58 Comment Link

    Oku tu'ulu e Potungaue Ako 'a e fonua ko e tupu mei he ta'emaa'usia moe ta'e fiefakaongoongo 'a e taki ko'eni ki he'ene kau ngaue mataotao ne nau kakau'i mai e potungaue he ngaahi ta'u lahi lolotonga oku taulau fakapolitikale holo ia 'I tu'a.. mahalo kuo lava ha ta'u 'e 35 ene ta'e hu ha lokiako ka oku faka'ulia 'ene fiepoto. Tau vakai ange koe toki Minisita Ako 'eni oku 'I he tu'unga fakaako maa'ulalo pea 'ikai ha taukei 'I hano fakalele ha 'apiako pe tukukehe 'a e fuoloa ta'u 'ene mavahe mei he Ako.. ke hokohoko lelei ha ngaue kuopau kete fakaongoongo ki he ni'ihi ne nau fakahoko ngaue maae potungaue he oku nau nofo moe visone ne nau kakau'i mai he ngaahi ta'u 'o 'enau ngaue. Koe ta'u pension 'oe kau faiako koe 60 he kuo 'ilo'i fakaako oku ikai toe lava e fo'i misini fkkaukau 'o toe langa'i hake hili e a'u ki he fa'ahinga ta'u ko'eni.. Tau tali kotoa pe kuo 'ikai toe taau e motu'a ni ke hoko ko e Minisita oe Ako he fonua ni.. kapau na'e 'ikai ke arrogant na'a ne tuku ke hoko atu a Taufe'ulungaki he oku osi mahino aupito pe a e Dr ia mo hono mala'e kae holi ke ala ki he me'a e hoko ai ko ha luma mo hono hako he ngaahi ta'u lahi...

    Report
  • Malia
    Malia Thursday, 07 April 2016 12:08 Comment Link

    Koe 'Eiki Minisita Ako 'o Tonga 'e 'ai ki ai e lea 'a e kau papalangi "...is a fool...".
    Ko 'ene palopalema moe palopalema 'o 'ene ongo buttinskis (Pive mo Sia) koe ignorance, disregard mo e totalitarian.

    Report
  • Sione T
    Sione T Thursday, 07 April 2016 11:33 Comment Link

    'Oua toe tali ki he kau faiakoo he 'oku nau 'i he malumalu 'o e PM. Fai mo fai ha fakahaa ke mahino ki he fonuaa mo e pule'angaa homou lotoo pea toki tanaki mai 'a e toengaa.

    Report
  • Suli
    Suli Thursday, 07 April 2016 10:53 Comment Link

    Mooni koe Tanoa, ko e ilifia koaa na'a si'i mole 'enau ngaue? Ikai kenau ilo tenau fihia kotoa he pango a e tokotaha pe ia mo hono famili eee

    Report
  • Tanoa
    Tanoa Wednesday, 06 April 2016 17:29 Comment Link

    Fai aa mo mou lea pe fai ha me'a kau faiako he 'e kau mo kimoutolu hono 'eke atu kiai e ola e ngaue pango ko'eni.

    Report
  •  Inoke
    Inoke Wednesday, 06 April 2016 14:08 Comment Link

    Ko e atunga ee ene nofo o lohu e Tongasat kuo hopo hake o fai ene foi ngaue pango i he Potungaue Ako pea e lohu koe Akilisi mo ho hako mei he to'utangata ki he to'utangata.

    Report
  • siaafafine
    siaafafine Wednesday, 06 April 2016 03:51 Comment Link

    "Tonga e ko 'eta folau ki fe ?" Ko e kupu'i lea ena 'o e hiva kemipeini 'a e Minista Ako 'i he teuteu 'o e fili 2014. "Kole atu ki he kau poto ke nau omi ki heni kau fakahino hino'i kinautolu". Ko e me'a ia 'a e 'Eiki Minista Ako 'i Falealea 'i hono alea'i e issue ki he founga fakamaaka 'o e sivi. 'Oku tonu leva ke fei mo 'asi mai he tami ni 'o fai ha tali ki he lipooti ko eni. Fokotu'u atu kuo taimi ke impeach e Minisita ko eni he kuo 'ikai kei taau 'ene fakahoko fatongia (maladministration). Pea ko fe ongo ki'i mataotao na'a ne fa'a tu'uaki mai (Siaosi & Piveni.

    Report

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

back to top